{"id":3614,"date":"2018-06-05T21:20:03","date_gmt":"2018-06-05T21:20:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.doingwhatmatters.com\/?p=3614"},"modified":"2023-07-12T14:40:35","modified_gmt":"2023-07-12T18:40:35","slug":"middle-school-reading-lists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/doingwhatmatters.com\/middle-school-reading-lists\/","title":{"rendered":"Middle School Reading Lists: What a difference 100 years makes!"},"content":{"rendered":"

I recently came across an interesting comparison of two middle school reading lists. The author, Annie Holmquist, compared a list from 1908 with a current list from the same state on the basis of time period, thematic elements, and reading level. The first list is packed with excellent books I enjoyed as a child (no, I wasn’t reading them in 1908!), and books that I have discovered and enjoyed in the years since. I would consider all of the 1908 selections to be delightful, engaging reading that should be well within the reach of a middle-school student. Virtually any of them would make an excellent family read-aloud.<\/p>\n

The more recent list contains two classics and a dramatic version of The Diary of Anne Frank<\/em>, rather than the book. I find it interesting that the modern reading selections seem chosen not to introduce students to some of the most fascinating times and places in history, but to wrap them in the familiar. That scarcely seems like the point of education.<\/p>\n

\"Middle<\/a><\/p>\n

I remember my own outrage in high school literature class when I found that our reading was not Shakespeare, Austen, or Twain, but rather S. E. Hinton’s\u00a0The Outsiders<\/a>, Rumblefish<\/a>,<\/i>\u00a0and That Was Then, This is Now<\/a>.\u00a0<\/em>There was nothing wrong with the Hinton books \u2014 they did correspond rather nicely to the current events in nearby East Los Angeles<\/a> and even in our neighborhood. They were interesting and relatable, and not even remotely challenging, and would have been great casual or summer reading and suitable for reading during a free-reading period at school. But why spend time on them in a literature class?<\/p>\n

My personal reading journey had been a bit different than most of my peers. I spent most of my childhood and teens reading old books \u2014 books in which characters, often kids my age, talked about or dramatized scenes from Shakespeare, mythology, and other great classics.<\/p>\n

I was tantalized by these glimpses of great literature, and had been looking forward to exploring classics such as The Odyssey<\/em><\/a>, King Lear<\/em><\/a>, and The Last of the Mohicans <\/em><\/a>in high school and wanted to share the reading experiences of my favorite characters. Beyond that, I’d realized that there was a\u00a0“great conversation<\/a>” happening \u2014 an ongoing process of writers and thinkers referencing, building on, and refining the work of their predecessors \u2014 and I wanted to listen in.<\/p>\n

I didn’t get to explore most of those classics in a classroom, but I ended up doing much of it on my own; then going still further in college as an English major; and beyond that with the Excellence in Literature curriculum. I’d be willing to bet that some of my classmates would have enjoyed the classics, too, just as today’s kids might be surprised to find they enjoy books written long before they were born.<\/p>\n

Below is the article that sparked this train of thought. I’ll be back at the end to add another thought or two.<\/p>\n

\n

Here is a slightly adapted version of the article by Annie Holmquist of Intellectual Takeout.<\/em><\/p>\n

Middle School Reading Lists: 100 Years Ago vs. Today<\/h2>\n

Annie writes, “I recently dug up a 1908 curriculum manual in the Minnesota Historical Society archives. It provided instructions on everything from teacher deportment to recommended literature lists for various grades. As a book lover, I was especially interested in the latter!”<\/p>\n

With the exception of a few textbook-like anthologies, the chart below lists the recommended reading material for Minnesota 7th<\/sup>\u00a0and 8th<\/sup>\u00a0graders in 1908:<\/p>\n

\"Middle<\/p>\n

With such a list in hand, I decided to\u00a0examine if the common accusation that today\u2019s education standards have been dumbed down is really true. To make sure I wasn\u2019t unfairly weighting this survey in favor of the past, I went to one of the Twin Cities metro area\u2019s finest districts, namely, Edina Public Schools. Again, with the exception of a few textbook anthologies, the list below offers the reading options for their\u00a07th<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0and\u00a08th<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0grade students:<\/p>\n

\"Edina<\/p>\n

In examining these lists, I noticed three important differences between the reading content of these two eras:<\/p>\n

1. Time Period<\/strong><\/h3>\n

One of the striking features of the Edina list is how recent the titles are. Many of the selections were published in the 21st<\/sup>\u00a0century. In fact, only four of the selections are more than 20 years old.<\/p>\n

In comparison, over half of the titles on the first list were at least 20 years old in 1908, with many of them averaging between 50 to 100 years old.<\/p>\n

Older is not necessarily better, but the books on the first list suggest that schools of the past were more likely to give their students time-tested, classic literature, rather than books whose popularity may happen to be a passing fad.<\/p>\n

2. Thematic Elements<\/strong><\/h3>\n

A second striking difference between the two book lists are the themes they explore. The first is full of historical references and settings which stretch from ancient Greece (Tanglewood Tales<\/em>) to the Middle Ages (Harold, Last of Saxon Kings<\/em>) to the founding of America (Courtship of Miles Standish<\/em>). Through highly recognized authors such as Longfellow, Stevenson, Kipling, and Dickens, these titles introduce children to a vast array of themes crucial to understanding the foundations upon which America and western civilization were built.<\/p>\n

The contemporary list, however, largely deals with modern history and seems to have a global focus. It touches on many current political and cultural themes such as the Taliban (The Breadwinner<\/em>), cloning, illegal immigrants, the drug war (The House of the Scorpion<\/em>), and deeply troubled youth (Touching Spirit Bear<\/em>). In terms of longstanding, classic authors, Mark Twain\u00a0and Ray Bradbury are\u00a0the only ones who stand out.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s good for children to understand the world in which they live, but as with any area in life, you can have too much of a good thing. A continual focus on modern literature narrows the lens<\/strong> through which children can view and interpret the world. Would it not be better to broaden their horizons<\/strong> and\u00a0expose them to a balance\u00a0of both old and new literature?<\/p>\n

3. Reading Level<\/strong><\/h3>\n

If you take a look at the books on the modern Edina list, most use fairly simple language and somewhat limited vocabulary. There are fewer books on the list \u2014 13 in the modern list; 20 in the 1908 list. Both lists contain tales of adventure, and the older list also contains short stories and poetry. There are books on both lists that I would enjoy reading \u2014 I’m just not sure that the modern list offers much, if anything in the way of a reading challenge for middle-graders.<\/p>\n

Consider a brief sample of text from The Last Book in the Universe<\/a>\u00a0<\/i>by Rodman Philbrick, a post-apocalyptic dystopian novel. The first-person narrator sounds casual and engaging and the plot sounds intriguing, but overall the book seems like a recreational read rather than something that would be studied in a classroom.<\/p>\n

“Nobody around here reads anymore. Why bother, when you can just shoot all the images and excitement straight into your brain? I’ve heard of books, but they were long before I was born, in the backtimes before the Big Shake…”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

On the other hand, consider the first paragraph of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow\u2019s Evangeline<\/em><\/a>. This epic story poem is based on tragic story that takes place during the forced removal by the British of the Acadian people from their homeland. Literature like this is not just about what happens, but it also immerses the reader in another world \u2014 a world where the pace slows and even the surroundings evoke a sense of mystery and meaning. This is literature that has influenced the writing of many other authors, too.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThis is the forest primeval. The murmuring pines and the hemlocks,
\nBearded with moss, and in garments green, indistinct in the twilight,
\nStand like Druids of eld, with voices sad and prophetic,
\nStand like harpers hoar, with beards that rest on their bosoms.
\nLoud from its rocky caverns, the deep-voiced neighboring ocean
\nSpeaks, and in accents disconsolate answers the wail of the forest.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The first example uses simple words and a casual sentence structure, while the second uses a rich, evocative vocabulary and a more complex writing format. Naturally, some might look at the second selection and say, \u201cGood grief! How do you expect a young person to understand that?\u201d<\/p>\n

But that\u2019s the whole point. Unless we give our students rich, challenging material to read, contemplate, and study, how will they ever advance beyond a basic reading level? Unless they hear and read beautifully crafted language, how will they ever learn to write? And if you look at the passage from Evangeline<\/em> again \u2014 isn’t this similar to the language that J. R. R. Tolkien uses in the songs and poetry in his writings? Try reading it aloud, or listen to a brief excerpt being read by Layne Longfellow<\/a>. It’s different from modern literature, but that’s not a bad thing.<\/p>\n

Annie says, “My takeaway from this comparison? It\u2019s fine that schools today have students read contemporary literature. But we still need to make sure that students also read good literature from the past and are sufficiently challenged.”<\/p>\n

The preceding portion of this post titled Middle School Reading Lists 100 Years Ago vs. Today<\/a> was originally published on Intellectual Takeout<\/a> by Annie Holmquist and adapted here by Janice Campbell. Both the new and the adapted versions of the article are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International<\/a> License.<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

So what would my middle-grade reading list include?<\/h3>\n

\"Introduction<\/a>Introduction to Literature<\/a><\/em>, the first level of my Excellence in Literature curriculum<\/a>, is designed to be used in grade 8 or 9. Students using it will read some of my favorite classics \u2014 absorbing books that are filled with adventure, humor, and even pathos. Generations of families have enjoyed these books, and the stories they tell are in their own way, timeless. References to these books still appear in more modern literature as well as in news articles and even company names. Remember Yahoo? Your student will meet the original Yahoos in Gulliver’s Travels<\/em> (and perhaps guess why I’ve never wanted to have a Yahoo email address!).<\/p>\n

    \n
  • Around the World in Eighty Days<\/em> by Jules Verne<\/li>\n
  • A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur\u2019s Court<\/em> or Joan of Arc<\/em> by Mark Twain<\/li>\n
  • Jane Eyre<\/em> by Charlotte Bront\u00eb<\/li>\n
  • Pygmalion<\/em> by George Bernard Shaw<\/li>\n
  • Treasure Island<\/em> by Robert Louis Stevenson<\/li>\n
  • Animal Farm<\/em> by George Orwell<\/li>\n
  • The Tempest<\/em> by William Shakespeare<\/li>\n
  • Gulliver\u2019s Travels<\/em> by Jonathan Swift<\/li>\n
  • Short Stories by Eudora Welty, O. Henry, Edgar Allen Poe, and others<\/li>\n
  • Poetry by writers such as T. S. Eliot, Emily Dickinson, and John Donne<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    These books are very accessible to young people, though the pacing and language is different from most modern books. As you saw above in the excerpts from Evangeline and\u00a0The Last Book in the Universe<\/em>, there’s a difference between old and new books, and students need some of both. It’s likely to be the old books that help them build the reading skills and vocabulary it takes to excel in language studies and exams such as the SAT and ACT.<\/p>\n

    Consider building your own home library<\/h3>\n

    One thing you can do to ensure that your middle-school students have both old and new good books to read is to build a home library<\/a> of excellent favorites. Ironically, some of the best books can be the least expensive if you don’t mind used copies from thrift shops, library sales, and yard sales. Homeschooling families who are downsizing after the kids have graduated can also be a great source of good books \u2014 just let people in your circles know that you adopt lonely books, and you’re likely to find more than a few.<\/p>\n

    Unfortunately, you can’t count on most public libraries to stock older books. The libraries still exist, but many are selling or throwing away books faster than they can be replaced. The formerly packed shelves of our town’s local library are nearly bare in some sections, while several stacks have been removed to make way for more computers and more audiovisual resources. In the children’s section, toys and jumbo building blocks have been added \u2014 not a bad thing, but just one more thing that seems to de-emphasize reading. An acquaintance who has volunteered in the library reported that current policy is to throw away books published before 1960, and to sell any that haven’t been loaned out in three years.<\/p>\n

    Wondering what to collect? One way to begin is to gather ideas for good old and new books is by looking up middle school reading lists from classical, private, or church schools. Think about books you loved when you were young, and also check reading lists from AmblesideOnline.org<\/a>, the site with the free K-12 Charlotte Mason curriculum.<\/p>\n

    As C. S. Lewis advised<\/a>, “after reading a new book, never . . . allow yourself another new one till you have read an old one in between.” Education is, after all, intended to broaden historical and literary horizons; not to entomb students in the comfort of the familiar. Remember \u2014 that a middle school reading list could be the gateway to a lifelong love affair with great books!<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    “Every age has its own outlook.<\/strong><\/em>
    \nIt is specially good at seeing certain truths and specially liable to make certain mistakes.<\/strong><\/em>
    \nWe all, therefore, need the books that will correct the characteristic mistakes of our own period.<\/strong><\/em>
    \nAnd that means the old books”<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

    C.S. Lewis, from his introduction to\u00a0On the Incarnation\u00a0<\/em>by\u00a0Athanasius<\/p>\n

    NOTE: Students using my American Literature<\/em><\/a> curriculum will get to study Evangeline<\/em> in its historical and cultural context, which makes it even more interesting.<\/p>\n

    Other articles you may enjoy:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    “Print or eBook for Literature Study?<\/a>”<\/p>\n

    “The Benefits of Reading: Seven Tips for Reading More”<\/a><\/p>\n

    “Teach Literature in Context”<\/a><\/p>\n

    “Choosing Books for Boys”<\/a><\/p>\n

    Read for Fun; Learning Happens Along the Way<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n